The Astounding, The Amazing, and the Unknown: On the Edge

The Astounding, the Amazing and the Unknown by Paul MalmontThe Astounding, the Amazing and the Unknown by Paul Malmont

[In our Edge of the Universe column, we review mainstream authors that incorporate elements of speculative fiction into their “literary” work. However you want to label them, we hope you’ll enjoy discussing these books with us.]

 ‘“Oh, my god,” Reinhart said, in a low, horror-struck whisper, as de Camp help up a pair of familiar thick-rimmed glasses for all to see. “You’ve vaporized Isaac Asimov!”’

About two-thirds of the way through Paul Malmont’s “secret history” novel about giants of the pulp science fiction world engaged in a classified World War II mission, I had a sad realization. I am too old for this book. I don’t mean that this book is intended for children or young adults, and I don’t mean that the writing is immature. Malmont is an able writer who is clearly passionate about the material he covers in The Astounding, the Amazing and the Unknown. I just already knew much of the information he imparts with the breathless glee of a seven-year-old doing a magic trick at the dinner table.

Malmont heaps a lot onto his plate in this book, and most of it is great fun. How could you resist a book that has Isaac Asimov, Bob Heinlein and L. Ron Hubbard as characters, a plan to make a ship disappear and re-appear, a “wonder-weapon” based on the work of Nicola Tesla, secret codes, underground vaults, mysterious devices, atomic weapons and sinister War Office spies? This story, set in 1943, should be a breakneck, sit-down-shut-up-and-hold-on wild ride of a story, and nearly half the time it is. The other half of the time, though, Malmont throws the whole shebang into neutral to share some bit of trivia about Heinlein, Asimov’s feud with Hugo Gernsbach, the diminishing popularity of The Shadow, or the antics of science fiction fans in the 1940s. He includes too many characters who serve no purpose except that they were actually around then. Gernsbach, for example, serves no purpose, and L Sprague de Camp, Heinlein’s second-in-command, does nothing to advance plot.

The book opens with an awkward and unnecessary story frame about J. Robert Oppenheimer and Richard Feynman, then flashes us back to 1943, with an intriguing scene on an island in Long Island Sound, an interlude with Nicola Tesla… then veers away from those too. For the next forty pages we get name-dropping and pulpy trivia before the clues are brought together and the story starts.

Malmont is also afraid to do the most important thing in fiction; create characters. I think he reveres these Golden Age writers, so he clings slavishly to what has been written about them (mostly, by them) and does not imagine them as characters in the fictional situation he has created. No one has a character arc. The one exception is Gertie Asimov, Isaac’s young wife, who feels abandoned and insecure in her new marriage, in a new city with a husband who is never home (and when he is, is clacking away on the typewriter). Gertie finds her strength when she is menaced by the War Office goons, and also puts some heat into her sputtering marriage after she is inspired by the uncensored version of Spicy Detective Stories. Unlike anyone else in the book, Gertie faces challenges, learns and grows. A marked contrast to her is the character of Virginia Gerstenfeld. In life, Virginia “Ginny” Heinlein was a powerful force in Heinlein’s life. She supported his writing, challenged his intellect, changed his politics, and kept his legacy alive until her own death. In The Astounding, the Amazing and the Unknown, she serves no purpose at all. Since Gertie is perfectly capable of filling the role of Plucky Girl Sidekick, and she actually has motivations and something to lose, I don’t know why Ginny is even in this story.

Because Malmont chose not to fictionalize things, L Ron Hubbard, the smart, probably-crazy scam artist, is the most interesting character in the story. That’s good, except that Hubbard is not one of the primary team, and the story drags horribly whenever we’re forced to spend time with Heinlein.

Despite all this grousing, I didn’t hate this story. I loved the section where our band of heroes follows an underground river beneath the Empire State Building. The mis-direction around Tesla’s Wardenclyffe installation and the remote apparatus that went with it was thoroughly enjoyable, and I loved it when Heinlein et al made a boat disappear and reappear, like magic. Malmont’s descriptions of Tesla’s machinery are wonderful. There are laugh-out-loud funny moments, like the passage at the top of this review. Heinlein’s sparring with his bureaucratic nemesis by spouting Groucho-Marx-like lines was funny every time.

I’m too old for this book because I’ve already heard or read about most of the trivia. Some I heard from second-string golden-agers, then in their geezer-hood, at science fiction conventions, but most I read in The Futurians, by Damon Knight. Far from eliciting a gosh-wow response from me, the retreading made me impatient, but if you haven’t read Knight’s book, and don’t check out these authors on Wikipedia, you may enjoy The Astounding, the Amazing and the Unknown.

I am the minority report on this book with my low rating. Most Amazon readers enjoyed it and our own Kat Hooper liked it far more than I did. This book suffered from my high expectations, but I do think Malmont is hampering himself. I think he would do better if, like Michael Chabon, he created fictional characters out of whole cloth and unleashed his storytelling imagination on them.

SHARE:  facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail  FOLLOW:  facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinrsstumblr

MARION DEEDS, with us since March 2011, is retired from a 35-year career with county government, where she met enough interesting characters and heard enough zany stories to inspire at least two trilogies’ worth of fantasy fiction. Currently she spends part of her time working at a local used bookstore. She is an aspiring writer herself and, in the 1990s, had short fiction published in small magazines like Night Terrors, Aberrations, and in the cross-genre anthology The Magic Within. On her blog Deeds & Words, she reviews many types of books and follows developments in food policy and other topics.

View all posts by Marion Deeds

One comment

  1. Most of the personal history about the pulp writers was new to me, but I thought the story was fun anyway. This was especially good on audio.

    About creating characters, I get the impression that Malmont reveres them enough that he doesn’t want to fictionalize them (as you mentioned). I think he’s relying on what’s known about them and not speculating further, perhaps so that he doesn’t misrepresent them. Or, perhaps he is simply trying to teach people like me the truth that what we do know about them. I can’t criticize him for that. Especially since the plot was entertaining enough to handle the lack of character growth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *