Eve: World-building doesn’t make sense

Eve by Anna CareyEve by Anna Carey

Eve by Anna Carey is light on the world-building as dystopias go. It’s not one of those books that offer an incisive commentary on some aspect of our existing culture. It’s more, “here’s a setting where things suck; now we have a backdrop for a romance/adventure story.” That’s not inherently bad. It just makes it a fluffy read, rather than a chilling one. Eve doesn’t possess the depth of books like Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (which Carey quotes in the front matter) or George Orwell’s 1984 or Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World or Suzanne Collins’s The Hunger Games. Even for a just-for-fun book, though, there are aspects of Eve’s world-building that don’t quite make sense.

The most jarring example is Eve’s education. Young orphan girls in Anna Carey’s “New America” are raised and educated to expect one kind of future, and then after graduation, are thrust into a completely different life than the one they were promised. This seems like an ineffective way to run an evil empire. Why do this bait and switch, which is expensive, time-consuming, pointless, and guaranteed to foster discontent? Why not just feed the girls propaganda about the life they’ll really have, selling it as a glorious mission?

Eve escapes the fate ordained for her at school, however, and finds herself on the lam. The rest of the novel follows her as she travels the ruins of the western United States looking for a safe haven. She makes an unlikely friend in a fellow runaway student, and also meets a boy and falls in love for the first time. If you’re looking for an exciting read about a girl and a boy falling in love while running from The Man, you may enjoy Eve.

For my part, though, I was irked. The illogic of the opening sequences got the book off to a bad start, and then I had issues with Eve as a character. She is a Mary Sue whose unique awesomeness is frequently touted. All the good guys love her. All the bad guys want to rape her, including the King of New America, whose obsession with a girl he’s never met is never really explained.

We are told of Eve’s selflessness, but her selfless acts are often told briefly or pushed offscreen. The behaviors we do see are frequently naïve (though this naiveté is understandable, to an extent) and selfish. My overall impression of Eve is that she does boneheaded things and then walks away unscathed while other people pay for her mistakes. If she learns a lesson, it’s the wrong lesson. At one point, she makes a mistake late at night. In the morning, she doesn’t confess to it until the evidence is discovered. Disaster follows. When Eve reflects on it later, she thinks, “It should’ve been the first thing I said when I awoke.” Not that she shouldn’t have done it, not that she should have asked and possibly learned a safer way to achieve her goal, not that she should have fessed up right after doing it — but that she should have said something earlier the following day.

The ending doesn’t seem to make much sense either. It feels, at first, like an out-of-character contrivance to create extra angst for book two. But on second thought, it fits pretty well with what we’ve seen of Eve so far.

[SPOILER. Please highlight if you’d like t o read it]: Eve reaches safety, while her badly injured boyfriend is left to fend for himself. I think the logic is that he’ll be safer without her. There’s some merit to that, but I just keep thinking about how badly injured he is and that he is all alone.


SHARE:  facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail  FOLLOW:  facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinrsstumblr

KELLY LASITER is a mild-mannered academic administrative assistant by day, but at night she rules over a private empire of tottering bookshelves. Kelly is most fond of fantasy set in a historical setting (a la Jo Graham) or in a setting that echoes a real historical period (a la George RR Martin and Jacqueline Carey). She also enjoys urban fantasy and its close cousin, paranormal romance, though she believes these subgenres’ recent burst in popularity has resulted in an excess of dreck. She is a sucker for pretty prose (she majored in English, after all) and mythological themes.

View all posts by Kelly Lasiter

3 comments

  1. I’m glad to see I wasn’t the only person to dislike this book for those reasons. I’ve seen lots of reviews in which people talk about how well the world was set up and how believable Eve was as a character, and I can’t help but think they must have been reading a separate book from me. I too thought the lies the girls were fed were nothing but a waste of time and resources, and the way American society had shifted so rapidly in such a short period of time seemed optimistic at best. Societies don’t change that rapidly, as a rule, even if disaster strikes them.

  2. How well the world is set up? LOL. The world barely is set up, it’s more like the author just said “Let’s make this as unpleasant as possible” without figuring out how it got that way or whether these various types of unpleasantness would coexist or not. And I found the character annoying. Totally agree with you.

  3. “Young orphan girls in Anna Carey’s “New America” are raised and educated to expect one kind of future, and then after graduation, are thrust into a completely different life than the one they were promised. ”

    Sounds like Catholic school!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>