Den of Thieves: Fun if your expectations aren’t too high

fantasy book reviews David Chandler The Ancient Blades 1. Den of Thievesfantasy book reviews David Chandler The Ancient Blades 1. Den of ThievesDen of Thieves by David Chandler

FORMAT/INFO: Den of Thieves is 480 pages long divided over a Prologue, four titled Parts, and 100 chapters. The book also includes a map of the Free City of Ness and an excerpt from A Thief in the Night, book two of The Ancient Blades trilogy. Narration is in the third person, mostly via the thief Malden and the knight Sir Croy, while minor POVs include Cythera. Den of Thieves is self-contained, but is the first volume in The Ancient Blades trilogy, which will be followed by A Thief in the Night in September 2011 and Honor Among Thieves in November 2011.

July 26, 2011 marks the North American Mass Market Paperback publication of Den of Thieves via Harper Voyager. The UK edition was published on July 7, 2011 via Harper Voyager UK.

ANALYSIS: When I first started reading Den of Thieves, I thought I was reading David Chandler’s debut novel. Soon after, I learned that David Chandler was actually a pen name for David Wellington, a writer of numerous horror novels including the Monster trilogy, the Vampire series and the Werewolf Tales. I’ve never actually read any of David Wellington’s books, but I do own several of the author’s novels because they sound right up my alley. Factor in comparisons to George R.R. Martin, Joe Abercrombie and Scott Lynch, and I admit I let my expectations run a little wild. So I’m partly to blame for my disappointment with Den of Thieves.

Of course, unfulfilled expectations are not the only reason David Chandler’s “debut” let me down. For starters, Malden is not very compelling as a protagonist, especially when compared to the likes of Locke Lamora from Scott Lynch’s Gentleman Bastard sequence, Mildmay the Fox from Sarah Monette’s The Doctrine of Labyrinths, and Drothe from Douglas Hulick’s Among Thieves. All similar heroes/anti-heroes. The problem with Malden, besides a dry narrative voice that is devoid of personality, is the author’s failure to capture the charm and cleverness that Malden supposedly possesses. Plus, for someone who believes there is no honor among thieves, Malden is curiously honorable for a thief.

Sir Croy, the novel’s other main protagonist, is much more likable than Malden for the first three-fifths of the book, but then the knight’s naiveté takes center stage, transforming his admirable qualities — honor, chivalry, loyalty, duty — into annoyances. Then there’s Cythera. Cythera, the daughter of a witch, is an important figure in Den of Thieves because of her curse, her connection to the sorcerer Alebron Hazoth, and the fact that Malden and Sir Croy are both in love with her. As a character, however, it’s hard to sympathize with Cythera, much the way it’s hard to sympathize or care about Malden and Sir Croy. In fact, minor characters like Cutbill, the master of thieves; the card sharp Kemper, whose curse gives him a unique ability; and Murdlin, envoy of the Dwarf Kingdom, were much more interesting in my opinion, and I wish they had been featured more prominently in the novel. Especially Murdlin with his amusing manner of speech: “This way, most hurriedly, like a rabbit making love.” / “Stop standing there manipulating yourself in an erotic fashion.” / “Into the hay that itches like pubic lice.”

Secondly, Den of Thieves is oddly tame considering how much experience David Wellington possesses as a horror fiction author. Sure, there’s the Lovecraftian-inspired guardian of the Burgrave’s crown, Hazoth’s demon child, and various other atrocities, not to mention the violence and rare profanity, but overall, I was disappointed by how PG-13 the novel turned out to be. Particularly when the book is mentioned in the same breath as George R. R. Martin, Joe Abercrombie, and Scott Lynch, whose novels are known for their realism and grittiness. If only that was the case with David Chandler’s novel. Instead, Den of Thieves is much more fantastical and over-the-top, having more in common — based on what I’ve heard — with its other comparisons in R.A. Salvatore and Raymond E. Feist. Not a bad thing if you’re a fan of those authors, but not what I was expecting.

Third, the writing in Den of Thieves is disappointingly uneven. The story’s pacing may be engaging, the prose polished, and the action scenes entertaining and well-written, but I expected more from someone with ten novels under his belt. Because Den of Thieves is David Wellington’s first foray into fantasy, I can forgive the lackluster world-building, which primarily focuses on the Free City of Ness, its charter with the King of Skrae, Ancient Blades, and the Bloodgod Sadu, while including such familiar tropes as dwarves, elves and ogres. I can also overlook the lack of imagination found in the book’s magic system, which features curses, summoning demons, magic swords, paying a price to use sorcery, etc. What I cannot forgive or overlook is the novel’s aforementioned shallow characterization and a story that suffers from predictability, weak plotting, and flimsy rationalizations. Like the whole reason the Burgrave’s crown was stolen in the first place!? Or Hazoth’s motives — if the sorcerer is so powerful, why would he even worry about the King of Skrae? Or anyone else for that matter?

Not only that, but was it really necessary for the author to spell out the novel’s various twists, especially considering how easy it was to figure things out beforehand? Also, is there any reason I should continue reading The Ancient Blades trilogy? The first book ties things up so neatly, I have no motivation to pick up the sequel. What’s the overarching story arc? The conflict? The end goal? Worst of all, Den of Thieves could have been so much better. What if the book was darker and grittier? What if the main characters were charming and sympathetic? What if the story was cunningly plotted and full of unexpected twists and surprises? What if…

Despite my obvious disappointment with the book, Den of Thieves is not nearly as bad as I’m making it sound. It may not offer fully developed characters, in-depth world-building, creative ideas, or clever plotting, but thanks to swift pacing and non-stop sword & sorcery action, Den of Thieves does provide lots of fun and thrills. Keeping expectations lowered though is the key to enjoying this novel. Because of the thief protagonist, the plot involving the Burgrave’s crown, and various other factors, I can see why Den of Thieves has drawn comparisons to Martin, Abercrombie, and Lynch. Unfortunately, neither the book nor the author is anywhere close to that level. In fact, Den of Thieves is not even on the same level as Douglas Hulick’s Among Thieves, a similar yet far superior fantasy debut that was released this same year. However, as long as readers understand what kind of book they’re getting, then Den of Thieves has plenty to offer…


SHARE:  facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail  FOLLOW:  facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinrsstumblr

ROBERT THOMPSON is the creator and former editor of Fantasy Book Critic, a website dedicated to the promotion of speculative fiction. Before FBC, he worked in the music industry editing Kings of A&R and as an A&R scout for Warner Bros. Besides reading and music, Robert also loves video games, football, and art. He lives in the state of Washington with his wife Annie and their children Zane and Kayla. Robert retired from FanLit in October 2011 after more than 2 years of service. He doesn't do much reviewing anymore, but he still does a little work for us behind the scenes.

View all posts by Robert Thompson (retired)

8 comments

  1. Thanks for the review. I ran across the book a while back, forgot about it…but still want to read it! To be safe, I think I’ll read the sample and see if it grabs me. I’m really, really hoping it is lighter fare than Martin, Lynch and so on–I don’t like any of those for the precise reason that they are just too much for my tastes. I made it quite a ways into Scott Lynch, but I was frankly bored by the huge amount of world building. I’m more into just the action–but characterization has to be there and you seem to have found that lacking.

    But anyway, good review. Gave me a good idea of what it might be like and reminded me of the name of a book I otherwise might not have seen again!

  2. You’re welcome Maria :) Den of Thieves is definitely much more accessible than GRRM or Scott Lynch. There’s also a lot more action than world-building, so no problems there. Characterization is a different story, but maybe you will find them more compelling than I did. I would definitely give it a try to see what you think!

  3. You’ve reminded me again about the Hulick book. I gotta read the Hulick book!

  4. I highly recommend reading Among Thieves Kat! It’s my favorite debut of the year along with The Whitefire Crossing…

  5. Hmm. Among Thieves actually sounds more interesting from a baseline description. BUT…is it as detailed and lengthy as Scott Lynch? Action? Detailed world building or does it move along without telling me about every nook/cranny in the cobblestones?

  6. Among Thieves is 480 pages long, but it’s a Mass Market paperback. So the book is actually shorter than it appears. The story is pretty fast-paced, and it didn’t take me very long to finish the book even though I was not that engaged in it. World-building is definitely not detailed. In fact, I described it as “lackluster” ;)

  7. 480 is not short. :>) That’s on the long side for what I generally read. This is really difficult since I like a good thief story, but I’m learning to Among Thieves. It sounds like a better story. Thanks for the input. If I can ever stop putting books in the cart and taking them back out, I’ll put in an order!

  8. Trust me, it’s short ;) Scott Lynch’s Red Seas Under Red SKies is 760 pages long in MMPB format. GRRM’s A Game of Thrones is over 800 pages long…the rest over 1000. If Den of Thieves had come out in hardback, I would guess it would probably be around 350 pages long.

    Regardless, Among Thieves is the better book any way. It’s a little edgier with hints of Scott Lynch, but more accessible. Whatever you decide to purchase, I hope you enjoy it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>