Bullet: Adieu, Anita

book review Laurell K Hamilton 19. Bulleturban fantasy book reviews Laurell K. Hamilton Anita Blake BulletBullet by Laurell K. Hamilton

Bullet begins with Anita slipping backstage at a dance recital. Her former friend Monica forgot the hat for her son’s costume, so Anita brings it to her, and the two women have a bit of a spat. Then, in chapter two, Anita sits down to watch the performance with her various boyfriends and —

Wait.

When I was a preteen, I used to read the BABY-SITTERS CLUB series. There’s one cardinal rule for reading BSC books: Skip chapter two. Chapter two was where Ann M. Martin always introduced the characters, describing each baby-sitter’s hair color, eye color, fashion sense, backstory, parents’ marital status… This benefited new readers, but once you’d read a few of the books it got repetitive. By the time you were a die-hard fan, not even the prospect of a new outlandish Claudia outfit could make you do more than skim this section.

After finishing chapter two of Bullet, I realized I’d just read a BSC second chapter, except with Anita’s boyfriends substituted for the club members. We learn, yet again, that Micah has green eyes and likes Italian suits, while Jean-Claude prefers leather pants, and Asher’s hair is gold (but not blond, somehow) and so on.

We move on to the ballet, and I will concede that Laurell K. Hamilton is actually not bad at writing dance scenes. But then Anita worries afterward that Jason and Nathaniel (who were in the show) can’t safely go outside in their tights and need to change clothes, because St. Louis is “the buckle of the Bible Belt” and people will think the guys are gay. Two problems with this. One, St. Louis is not even remotely the buckle of the Bible Belt. Two, THEY’RE LYCANTHROPES. I think they’re more than a match for any good ol’ boys who might fancy a spot of gay-bashing.

But anyway, eventually the characters get back to the Circus of the Damned, and the plot returns to the familiar morass of drama, sex, macho posturing, and confusing metaphysics. Continuity has left the building. Characters have undergone huge personality shifts offscreen, and bad editing means things often just don’t make sense. (Anita muses that she’s never been with anyone as long as she’s been with Micah — two years — and then reflects on her six years with Jean-Claude. Asher gets tied up, and a few pages later he’s in chains instead. Nitpicky stuff, maybe, but when there are lots of these moments in one book, they add up.) The usual tics are here, too: things tightening low in Anita’s body, more at home with the monsters than he was, werecats like to cuddle, spilling.

The sad part is, I think Hamilton herself has moments of realizing that the books have become silly, as when Bibiana asks Anita to help her tigers gain special abilities and she replies, “So I what, f*ck everyone into their next power level like some pornographic computer game?” This cracked me up. Because it’s true.

I gave up when I realized that I still had 200 pages left to go and that, quite simply, I didn’t want to read those pages. Why give up now, after weathering Narcissus in Chains’ smuttification and Incubus Dreams’typo storm? My TBR pile has grown, my free time has shrunk, and this badly edited mess is gobbling up time I could spend reading something else. Adieu, Anita.


SHARE:  facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail  FOLLOW:  facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinrsstumblr

KELLY LASITER is a mild-mannered academic administrative assistant by day, but at night she rules over a private empire of tottering bookshelves. Kelly is most fond of fantasy set in a historical setting (a la Jo Graham) or in a setting that echoes a real historical period (a la George RR Martin and Jacqueline Carey). She also enjoys urban fantasy and its close cousin, paranormal romance, though she believes these subgenres’ recent burst in popularity has resulted in an excess of dreck. She is a sucker for pretty prose (she majored in English, after all) and mythological themes.

View all posts by Kelly Lasiter

2 comments

  1. Yeah, we’ll see if you don’t read the next one, Kelly! :hmmmm:

  2. Heehee! Well, only if early reviews indicate the presence of a plot. ;)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>