Daryl Gregory’s pharma-tech novel Afterparty is good entertainment with many wonderful moments. At times it is wildly inventive — filled with images like an apartment full of tiny genetically-engineered bison roaming the “range” of wall to wall grass, or an angel named Dr. Gloria who wears a business suit, white coat, glasses, carries a clipboard and has wings.
Kat and I read this book about the same time. We both gave it four stars but we may have liked different things, so we’re going to discuss the book together. Kat’s comments are in red.
Here’s a brief synopsis of the story.
In the near future, a neuroscientist with a deity in her head checks herself out of an institution and goes searching for the people who are distributing the street drug called Numinous (or sometimes, Logos). Lyda Rose is intimately familiar with the drug because she helped invent it, as a treatment for schizophrenia… and, because of an overdose of the drug at a disastrous “afterparty,” she is intimately familiar with its effects. Specifically, it puts a god in your head. Dr. Gloria is Lyda’s personal god.
Kat, you’re a neuroscientist, and this book is packed with neuroscience. What did you think about it? Was it realistic?
Yes, I thought it was frighteningly realistic. Scientists have been working for decades trying to tweak drugs that will be more effective treatments for schizophrenia. Gregory gets this just right as he talks about the neuroscience behind drug design. Also, a really hot topic in neuroscience these days is “consciousness” or “self-awareness.” What is consciousness? Which brain areas are involved? What happens when you change activity in those areas? What kind of psychoses or other perceptual experiences may develop when you mess with these areas? Schizophrenia involves change in brain activity and some of the symptoms, such as auditory hallucinations and delusions (which are often religious in nature) involve self-perception. These are fascinating things to speculate about.
There is a really chilling plausibility and immediacy to that part of the book, particularly when Lyda opines that “any high school student with a chemjet printer and an internet connection could download recipes and print small-batch drugs.”
When we talked about this by email, you and I both used the words “William Gibson-like,” and so have other reviewers. I liked that aspect of the book — the zany, almost-underworld characters like the Millionaires’ Club, the guy raising miniature bison in his apartment.
Or how about the paranoid guy who thinks he keeps his “self” in a small container around his neck? He made me laugh so many times (and he was particularly well done in the audio version I listened to). Yeah, many of these characters could have walked right out of a Gibson novel, yet they were all unique. But, as we discussed, this is almost over the top. Nearly every character is some sort of bizarre and it comes off as trying just a little too hard. I wish Gregory had saved a couple of those ideas for future books. But still, I loved them.
I was also reminded of Neal Stephenson’s Reamde which is a similar type of weird paranoid adventure. Fans of Gibson and Stephenson will love Afterparty.
I agree, although I did have some trouble with the “when” of the story. I think there is even a specific year given at one point, but it didn’t stick, and I struggled with just now “near future” we were. On the other hand, I thought the border-crossing scene was spine-tinglingly intense, and there were amazing descriptions. One of my other favorite scenes is the party in New York, when Lyda takes what I’m going to call “the color drug.” That was vivid and hilarious. Dr. Gloria’s reaction to that drug actually had me laughing out loud.
Those were some of my favorite scenes, too. One of the best lines in the book comes from that Color Bomb scene: “’How are you doing?’ he asked chartreusely.”
I loved that line!
It was all very clever. And yes, all throughout the book there were vivid descriptions and apt similes and metaphors. I admired Gregory’s style and look forward to reading more of his work.
As for the timing, it didn’t bother me that I didn’t know exactly. Based on the science, I could tell it was very near future, like within the next 10 years. These are things that could happen very soon. (I don’t think they will, just that they could.)
By the way, because of the science, I could really relate to Lyda. I also studied neuropharmacology in grad school and had a fantasy of finding the perfect treatment (or cure) for schizophrenia. Lyda has a family history of schizophrenia and knows it’s in her genes. She’s desperate for a treatment, as anybody with her knowledge and background would be. I totally understood her. And I was intrigued by the fact that as readers, we don’t know if her current problems (alcohol and drug addictions, invisible angel) are caused by her genetics, the drug she was exposed to, or the immense amount of stress she’s encountered (which can trigger psychoses in people with genetic predispositions).
I have to say that I had a little bit more trouble with the main character than you did. I think Gregory did himself a disservice by creating Lyda the way he did. Late in the book, one character says that the deity in your head is supposed to make you a better person, and throughout the book various characters express different ideas about whether the effect is a delusion (“your” god) or big-G God. That’s part of the point of the story. Still, I felt with Lyda there were times when Gloria was too literally “the better angel of her nature.” My favorite character was Ollie and probably my second favorite was Sasha, although she is closely tied with Dr. Gloria for sheer awesomeness.
Dr. Gloria was my favorite character — she was like the classic sarcastic sidekick, but because she was quiet, refined, and sophisticated, she never became annoying (as many sarcastic sidekicks do). As for Ollie, I was intrigued by her special mental powers that came from taking a drug called Clarity. It was just reasonable enough to be almost believable and I enjoyed thinking about that. I’m particularly interested in neuropharmacology, so I found a lot to think about in Afterparty.
I just wished I could take Clarity myself. By the way, what did you think of the whole God thing?
Ah, you ask me that because you know I’m a Christian. This is another area that cognitive neuroscientists are interested in these days — what is the nature of religious experiences? How do people experience God? If there’s a place in the brain where neural activity makes people feel spiritual, does that mean that God is an illusion? (Hint: No, because I can stimulate your brain and make you think of your grandmother and you wouldn’t say she’s not real.) Can drugs make us believe in God? If so, does that mean God doesn’t exist?
These are fascinating things to think about. I’ve answered them for myself (based on my own research in the scriptures, history and other areas, not based on “feeling” or “intuition” that I know is so easily altered) but Daryl Gregory leaves these crucial questions unanswered and the ending is ambiguous. Is Lyda’s angel/god real? Nobody else sees Dr. Gloria, but occasionally she can physically alter Lyda’s circumstances. Lyda “knows” Dr. Gloria is just an affect of the drug, but she’s not surprised when miracles happen. I appreciated the ambiguity that Gregory left us with. I thought it was well done.
I thought he had some powerful points about the nature of faith, but also in the power of fellowship; that the movement associated with Numinous is not top-down and hierarchal, but genuinely grassroots. That was an interesting choice.
I would say we’re pretty much in agreement that Gregory pulled off an entertaining, original story here.
Yes, and let me say something about the audio version. It’s 11 hours long, was produced by Audible Studios, and read by Tavia Gilbert. Gilbert was so convincing in all the different roles that I completely forgot I was listening to a performance. I think that’s high praise. Readers, this is a great audio choice!