The Belgariad — (1982-1998) Young adult. Publisher: It all begins with the theft of the Orb that for so long protected the West from an evil god. As long as the Orb was at Riva, the prophecy went, its people would be safe from this corrupting power. Garion, a simple farm boy, is familiar with the legend of the Orb, but skeptical in matters of magic. Until, through a twist of fate, he learns not only that the story of the Orb is true, but that he must set out on a quest of unparalleled magic and danger to help recover it. For Garion is a child of destiny, and fate itself is leading him far from his home, sweeping him irrevocably toward a distant tower—and a cataclysmic confrontation with a master of the darkest magic.
        
The Belgariad
Back before David Eddings became a shampoo-rinse-repeat sort of author, churning out the same old storylines and character types, there was the original Belgariad series, which remains by far his best work.
The premise is an old stand-by — farmboy discovers he’s not who he thought he was and, along with a band of helpers, goes on a quest to stop the world’s destruction/domination by the evil one. But Eddings manages to breathe a lot of life into the archetypical plot. His characters are gradually revealed throughout the series to have hidden layers of complexity, his main character, Garion, grows throughout the series, the tone darkens and deepens as one goes on, the world tour is detailed and interesting, the plot quick moving, and there is a great deal of humor laced throughout, often in the form of great character banter.
The Belgariad remains one of the better series to have come out, and in fact the formula worked so well that Eddings basically decided to use it again and again and again. Personally I found the repetition in later series grew too tiresome to tolerate, but none of that diluted the first joy that came with reading The Belgariad. It’s not as strong in its depth or literary creation as some others, but sometimes fun is enough. —Bill Comments
The Belgariad
There are those books that, when you read as a child, you adore, and on reaching adulthood find that they are still just as good. It was with great sadness that I recently realised The Belgariad is not one of them. It is still very good, but with my own maturation it has lost that certain something which, aged twelve, inspired sheer wonder.
The Belgariad starts with Pawn of Prophecy, and, after a prologue detailing a small but key passage from the history of that world, places us on an unimportant farm in an inconsequential corner of an insignificant kingdom. We are introduced to the young boy Garion, who is cared for by his Aunt Pol. He grows a little, a mysterious old man shows up (with a little bit of mischief and the extraordinary about him), he grows a little more and then they have to leave in circumstances our boy does not fully understand. They set out on an adventure clearly of much more significant importance than a cook, an old man, and a boy should have any part of. Sound familiar? That's because it is.
Even at eleven or twelve, when I first read David Eddings' maiden epic, I recognised elements of the plot right from its inception. On a reread, it feels tired and predictable — and in truth it is, to a certain extent. This is a fairly simple tale of a MacGuffin quest with the adolescent far more significant than he seems at first glance, and the spectre of an evil foe lurking in the background. The plot is simplistic to a certain extent, predictable in most extents (even as a child I spotted the twists coming several hundred pages in advance) and largely unoriginal almost in its entirety. But even with my most cynical hat on, The Belgariad still has considerable merit.
Simply put, Eddings' can turn a phrase and absorb his reader like few others. To use his own phrase, he has 'felicity of style' — that is, the words themselves are attractively and compellingly composed. And he is funny — few authors can make me smile the tenth time I read a joke of theirs, and Eddings can. His characters are funny as well — from the patronisingly sardonic Aunt Pol, to the cynical Silk and the mischievous Old Wolf, there are personalities that can keep one entertained at those points in the plot where one's attention may otherwise have begun to stray.
That is not to say that the characterisation here is exceptional, because it isn't. It is good, don't get me wrong — I feel I can picture many of these characters better than in a plethora of other titles, but they do lack a certain complexity and, in some cases, originality. The fantasy posse device is in force in this work, and its make-up is unlikely to stun or amaze any readers well-used to the fantasy genre.
While the overall plot itself is not particularly absorbing, some of the individual episodes the characters — particularly Garion himself — find themselves in are genuinely engaging, from the tense to the dramatic to the romantic. Eddings has a very human feel to his work, and where he does not quite set the world alight when dealing with the epic elements, even after many rereads I still feel excited, sympathetic and amused by the antics and adventures the characters go through. It is perhaps these elements, along with the humorous and enjoyable (if perhaps simplistic) characters that are the real strength of the work.
Eddings' world is highly detailed and one can genuinely understand it with alacrity, but it has some flaws. The first is that Eddings has clearly (and by his own admission) based some of the nations on real places from history — to a European (even a very young one), these are blindingly clear. The second, slightly more controversial flaw, is the stereotyping. Many nations in the world of The Belgariad have national characteristics, from the positive (hard work, bravery, and intelligence) to the negative (stupidity, greed, and duplicity). To some, this has been seen as distasteful, particularly when those nations have clearly been inspired by real countries. I would leave the truth of that viewpoint to the individual reader, but certainly I was disappointed somewhat by such a simplistic representation of a nationality, even one which has been completely fabricated from the author's imagination.
With the advantage of hindsight, this book is ideal for the adolescent just beginning to move between purely child-orientated fantasy and genuine adult books. Were I buying a fantasy book for a younger relative, there would be few titles I would pick above Pawn of Prophecy. The length of each book is undaunting and, while the series is five books long, it is not difficult to get through. The violent content is small and not particularly shocking, even when I first read it, and sex is something which is hinted at as happening but never detailed. For adults, I would still say that this is a series worth reading, but there are books and series I would endorse more strongly. If you are mainly concerned with substance (plot), this is perhaps not the series for you, but I would still suggest a venture; if you don't like it, you would have wasted little time. If you do, you have four more books to enjoy. If you are particularly fond of characters, humour, and entertaining episodes rather than a grand scheme, then this is to be strongly encouraged.
In summation, The Belgariad may no longer hold the high place in my pantheon of fantasy epics it once occupied, but it is still very good and worth a read — particularly by younger readers. —T.D. Comments
Pawn of Prophecy: Juvenile
I read Pawn of Prophecy as an adult, a few years ago. I had heard great things about it, so I was disappointed after reading it. The plot is typical "orphan boy saves the world" fantasy, the description is weak, the dialogue is often silly (humor is a focus, and much of the dialogue is funny — but it's not realistic). The pace is rapid, however, and I flew through the book in one day.
The Belgariad would be just right for a teenager (so I give it 3 stars), but not for an adult who's looking for something deeper to savor. —Kat Comments
|
DAVID EDDINGS passed away June 2, 2009
A.B. how could you say that it is all the same. sure he keeps the same plot outline but he always throws new and improved plot twists into them. clearly you havent read any of the dragonlance chronicles.
A.T.:
I read the Belgariad as it started coming out in the early 1980's. I loved that series so much that I continually would drive to the bookstore to see when Castle of Wizardry was coming out (I was able to buy the first three books at the same time). I still have a very fond spot in my heart for that series. My trouble is, and a great deal of reviewers agree with me, that he repeats the formula again and again. Once it was done, he should have switched gears. I thought that he had with the first bit of the Elenium, but then he slipped back into his familiar pattern.
In fact, I did read the first few Dragonlance Chronicles series, again as they were released in the mid-1980's. I also liked this series, but not as much as the Belgariad. I stopped reading it when they started expanding it so fast, as I do not like "universe" books (Forgotten Realms, Star Wars, Star Trek, etc.).
A.T., I don't think that I could read the Belgariad now and enjoy it as much as I did when I was 16. The difficulty is that I have grown up in the mean time, and the books, of course, remain static. Therefore, I won't wreck my memories and read that series again. I am now middle-aged, more cynical and worldly, and I demand a very high quality in the books I read. Fantasy has grown up since the likes of Eddings, Brooks and Weis and Hickman were writing in the 1980s. It is now much more real and relevant, instead of a light escape. What I read now is the likes of George R.R. Martin, Janny Wurts, Guy Gavriel Kay, Steven Erikson. I consider these to be works of literature, by authors who do more than tell a story, but also write a piece of artwork that worms its way into my very soul, and changes me a bit. I used to like Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time, until it went off the rails around book 7 (his editors should have reigned him in).
Mr. Eddings might throw in plot twists here and there, but my main criticisms are that he has done nothing about decent character development, nothing about improving his banter-style dialogue (which gets boring to me), nothing about creating a depth of description of his worlds that makes the reader feel like its real (J.R.R. Tolkien was the best at this, but the ones I mention are pretty good too). Without these things, Eddings' books will remain pulp fiction instead of literature. Eddings' prose is brisk and efficient, which is good for his kind of fantasy.
If you like David Eddings, I think that is great. After all, my opinion is just that: my opinion. Most of my friends and family don't like the books I read, and I really don't care about their opinion. You could do a lot worse than Eddings, and his stories are a lot of fun. I also think it is fabulous that you are reading fantasy. Personally, I look for something a lot deeper than a light escape these days when I am reading. If you want something that does more than entertain you, I suggest you buzz around this site, look at the chat areas, and see what the various reviewers have said about the authors. My personal favourite is Janny Wurts, and you can check my reviews on her books to see where I am coming from.
Welcome to Fanlit, and I hope you stick around.
A.B.